home > activities


 

 


Activities of Year 2004

DECEMBER

Strategic Planning Meeting

The Annual Strategic Planning Meeting of BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights for 2005 took place at Hotel Aledjo Cotonou, Benin Republic from December 14-21 2005. The theme of the strategic planning meeting was “Valuing Ourselves and the Work we do: Strategies for Sustainability. The theme was chosen to reflect the preparation for the Celebration of BAOBAB’s Tenth Anniversary to be marked in the coming year. All members of staff including two Outreach Team Coordinators were present. It was a time to reflect on the work carried out in 2005 – to evaluate what was done well and identify possible areas that could be improved upon. 

Activities for 2006 were planned, and the team also took time to unwind from the busy schedules of the just ended year with the hope that everybody would leave the retreat more refreshed and happier than they came. Above all they would rededicate to the vision and principles of BAOBAB.

There were sessions on personality development, identifying the power within, fundraising strategies, review of administrative procedure, managing conflict in a work environment and enhancing our relationships with NGOs, CBOs and the Government Sector. These sessions were educative, enriching and crucial to sustain BAOBAB. BAOBAB personnel and the Vicky Adidu, coordinator of Kaduna Outreach facilitated the sessions.

 The Outreach team Coordinators represented gained new ideas and strategies. It is hoped that these strategies will be adopted for effectiveness of their work. The two members from Kaduna and Kogi State outreach teams gave more insights on the impact of their work in the communities.

NOVEMBER

National Discussion on Sharia and Women’s Human Rights in Nigeria Series Two

Background                                                                                        

BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights (BAOBAB) since inception in 1996 has been working on issues of rights of women and religion from the background of the Women and Laws Research, which was carried out earlier on. There were a number of emerging issues on the development, promotion and protection of the human rights of women, which led to intervention activities carried out in different States in Nigeria through the outreach teams. The intervention is on going especially in the areas of women’s access to justice, development of the rights of women living under Muslim Laws - on issues of custody, divorce, maintenance as well as other right based issues like women’s sexuality and women’s role in development.

With the expansion of the Sharia Legal system in 1999, more issues of women‘s human rights emerged requiring proper understanding and or clarifications especially on what the rights of women are under the new dispensation.

BAOBAB started a series of two-day National Discussions on Sharia and Women’s Human Rights, the first of its kind in Nigeria, in June 2004. Resource persons are invited from within and outside the country to present papers. Participants are selected from diverse backgrounds, specifically from the Judiciary, Academia, National Human Rights Commission, Embassies, Funding Agencies, Outreach teams, Religious groups, Human Rights Activist, etc.

 The main objectives of the series are:

·          To follow up on earlier programs organized by BAOBAB and the issues emerging there from.          

·          To create the necessary atmosphere for discourse on women’s human rights and Sharia Implementation

·          To further the discussion on Sharia and women’s human rights

·          To correct the impression that women’s human rights cannot be discussed in relation to Sharia implementation and practice in particular and religion in general

·          To promote the protection of women’s human rights under Sharia implementation

BAOBAB hopes that the understanding created at these discussions will be the beginning of other conversations aimed at advancing the promotion, protection and development of women’s human rights in Nigeria as well as being a positive reference point for other countries. The meeting is schedule to take in Abuja from 16th to 17th November 2005.

There are two broad themes for this year’s discussions with sub-themes under each broad theme as follows

1)         Between Legal Principles and Legal Reality: The Impact on the Human Rights of Women.

    A.     The Judiciary in Divorce Cases: Legal Principles and or Reality

    B.     Empirical review of Cases. (This is to be backed up by reference)

2)         The Rights of Women in Marriages: theory and Practice. This should be an Empirical Review of the Situation of Women in Marriage.

     A.    Increasing rate of Domestic Violence in Muslim Marriages

     B.    The Role of Institution in Reducing the Occurrence of Violence Against Women in Muslim Communities 

SEPTEMBER

Human Rights Training Workshop                                       Maidugiri, Borno State.                                                            BAOBAB organised a 5-day training workshop for Judicial personnel and Police officers from Borno and Yobe states in the North Eastern part of Nigeria with support from the British High Commision. The workshop took place in Maiduguri between September 6 and 10, 2005. There were twenty-five participants in attendance, made up of Sharia court judges, police officers, Sharia court registrars and security personnel. There were facilitators from BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights (BAOBAB) and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).  Using the draft – Human Rights Training from a Gender Perspective: A Manual, the facilitators engaged the participants in an in-depth analysis of human rights issues as they affect women and national and international human rights mechanisms for actualising the rights of women. The major components of the training are gender, human rights and communication.

The training exposed participants and facilitators alike to the constraints to achieving gender equality and guaranteeing the enjoyment of the provisions of legal documents for women’s human rights. They concluded that discriminatory practices against women persist because of such factors as patriarchy, misinterpretation of religious texts, corruption, illiteracy, unemployment and poverty among others.

The workshop created an avenue for sharing experiences and networking amongst the judicial personnel and the development of a relationship with BAOBAB. It is anticipated that the benefits from the workshop will reflect in the attitude and actions of beneficiaries within their communities.

AUGUST

National Consultative Meeting on Violence Against Women (August 30-31, 2005)

In sustaining her zero tolerance against violence against women advocacy, BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights (BAOBAB) organized a two-day National Consultative discussion on Violence against women and girls. The meeting took place at Chelsea Hotel, Abuja Nigeria, in recognition of the strategic positioning of the Federal Capital Territory, between the 30th and 31st of August 2005.

The meeting convened about thirty (30) participants from various fields of influencing social change such as the media, human rights and other development NGOs, the diplomatic corps, funding organizations, government officials and state agents, faith-based groups, legislators, survivors and like-minded individuals.

The Consultative meeting had the following objectives:

·          To engage strategically placed stakeholders in a conversation on the need to step up action on the incidence of violence against women and girls in Nigeria

·          To analyze emerging trends of violence against women and girls

·          To deliberate on the status of the violence against women bill currently at the National Assembly

·          To assess the impact of Regional and International human rights instruments in addressing violence against women in Nigeria

 On Day One of the meeting, there were formal presentations and discussions in the following sub – thematic areas:

(i)                  Multiple Perspectives on Violence against Women and Girls within private and Public Spaces: Trends, Laws and Policies

(ii)                Feminist Advocacy, Women’s Agency and Violence against Women and Girls

(iii)               Globalization, Shifting Boundaries of Power Relations and Violence against Women

The papers presented traced the incidence of violence against women and the fact that it transcends all boundaries in all countries of the world. It also identified violence against women and girls as the most prominent form of abuse of women’s human rights across the globe. The phenomenon according to the presenters affect women in private and public arenas and has been linked at different times with other global concerns, such as globalization, neo-liberalism, poverty and issues relating to power and control. Consequently, violence against women and girls has, over the years emerged a critical area of concern for development practitioners and women’s human rights activists.

The papers further identified the fact that Women and girls remain the main victims of gender violence in Nigeria, largely because Nigeria is a patriarchal society. As a result, atrocities are committed against women and girls under the guise of religion and culture. Hierarchical gender roles, attributes and responsibilities, also ensure that women have lower status and less power in society than men. This is exacerbated by women’s lack of means to sustain themselves owing to their low level or total lack of education, which ultimately results in their dependent and subordinate status within the family. The last paper presented stated the need for defining a comprehensive framework to end violence against women. It also identified the need for a redefining of strategies and harmonizing them, need to launch new ideas and continue to build capacities aimed towards ending violence against women.

Day Two featured interactive workshop sessions on issues arising from the presentations of the previous day and strategies for the way forward. A communiqué was produced at the end of the meeting.

JULY

Bridge Building West Africa

BAOBAB is organizing the Bridge building meeting for West Africa. It will take place in Ghana from June 26- July 1, 2005. Participants will be drawn from different countries in West Africa. The objectives of this training are

             To build amongst women:

·          knowledge of religious-legal arguments for women’s rights in Muslim laws vis-à-vis restrictive and conservative interpretations and/or those on Arab, Hausa or other customs which restrict women

·          knowledge of the empirical variations in Muslim laws in Muslim societies today

·          an awareness of the struggles of Muslim women for the rights, since the beginning of the Muslim era and throughout the Muslim world (i.e. women fighting for their is neither new nor western, nor is it anti-Islam)

·          awareness of the ways in which conservative religious and political establishments have (abused religion against women’s rights in many religion

2. To build bridges between women of Muslim and non-Muslim backgrounds so as to recognize the importance of developing a mutually respectful position that women’s rights need to be protected, developed, fought for whether in under statutory, common law, religious and customary laws.

3. To work on a mutual strategy, in light of the current political context in Nigeria, for defending and promoting women’s rights in the systems

This is the second meeting to be held in West Africa, (The first took place in the Gambia in 2004)

 

Post Beijing +10/CEDAW Coalition Meeting

On June 22, 2005, there will be a  Post-Beijing +10 review meeting with like minded women’s human rights organizations especially those that participated during the Beijing + 10 review process as well as members of the NGO CEDAW coalition. The main aim of the meeting will be to discuss a follow-up to the outcome of the Beijing + 10 review process and discuss possibilities of dialoguing with the Nigerian government to ensure that the outcome of Beijing + 10 is incorporated in the agenda of the Millennium Summit scheduled for September at the United Nations Headquarters in New York. The meeting will also be a forum to discuss the progress of the domestication of CEDAW in Nigeria and other advocacy steps to be followed.

 

JUNE

 

Africa Pre–OBM meeting

BAOBAB is coordinating the Africa Pre- OBM meeting organized by the international solidarity network of Women Living Under Muslim laws (WLUML). This meeting is scheduled to take place in Mali from June 13-17, 2005.

There are two parts to the meeting – the first will be a two – day meeting for twenty (20) active networkers to discuss the constituencies of WLUML networkers in Africa, their needs as well as their roles/ responsibilities. This is aimed at developing strategies to strengthen the network in Africa.

 

Leadership Training for Professional Women

From May 2nd to 6th, 2005, leadership trainings will be held for professional women in Benin and Ilorin. Sponsored by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), beneficiaries are professional women –politicians, corporates, NGO executives, academics and media professionals.

 

Between May 17th and 21st 2005, a leadership training workshop will be conducted for women at the grassroots in the Hausa language.

 

A collaborative project of the Women’s Learning Partnership for Rights, Development and Peace – USA (www.learningpartnership.org ) and its partners Association Democratique des Femmes du Maroc – Morocco, BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights – Nigeria and Women’s Affairs Technical Committee, Palestine (www.pal-watc.org), the leadership training programme is based on the following premises:

 

·          In most communities, men are seen as dominant and women as inferior.  Society would gain politically, economically and culturally if the genders were evened out. 

·          Good leadership serves both men and women in society.

·          Good leadership is inclusive, participatory and does not leave out any part of the community.  It teaches men and women to be partners, not to fight against each other.

·          Leadership is horizontal.  Horizontal leadership, as opposed to vertical leadership creates the conditions for the equal treatment of men and women.

·          True leadership leads to greater choices for everyone.

 The second meeting will be attended by networkers and potential networkers as well as our allies (individuals and organisations) within the region to analyse Democracy and Diversity, Globalization and NEPAD, Conflict Resolution and Peace Building from a gender perspective. There will be short paper presentations /panel discussions. We are anticipating that sixty participants will attend this part of the meeting.

 

MAY

 

Bridge Building Meeting on Rights of Women and Religion

 

BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights recently organized a six-day meeting for a cross section of participants from the academia, NGOs, Media, Religious Groups and the Civil Service on the rights of Women and Religion.

 

The six-day meeting which had the Muslim Group for the first three days and the Christian Group for the following three days was held at the Federal Palace Hotel, Victoria Island Lagos. Between May 9th and 14th 2005 was organized to build the bridges of understanding on the rights of women across different religious and cultural backgrounds.

 

Amongst other topics, Gender, Thoughts and Belief systems were discussed extensively relating it to how stereotypes resulting from it could impact on the interpretations of religious texts, which in turn impacts on the promotion, and protection of the rights of women.  There was also extensive analysis of how oral traditions as transmitted from one generation to another contribute to gender stereotypes and the negation of the rights of women. The discussion also addressed some of the factors responsible for the misconception and misrepresentation of women especially when their human rights are discussed from religious background.

 

Politics, Religion and Reasoning was examined in the context of a particular set of people or groups in the society that resist change, claim they have the right answers and try to set parameters for people to follow. Amidst all, such groups in their politics of people believe in the subordination of women.

 

Several issues of rights of women were discussed ranging from protection from violence both at home and in the public, access to non-discriminatory education; right to work, right to inheritance, etc. It was observed at this meeting that some religious texts are interpreted based on several other cultural beliefs which most times negate the rights of women and present the woman as a second class citizen. In general, the group noted that under the guise of religion women’s rights are greatly violated.  It was therefore emphasized that more of progressive and positive interpretations of religious texts should be embarked upon especially by religious leaders to ensure the protection of the rights of women and to disabuse people’s mind from the misconception that women’s rights cannot be discussed against the background of religion.

 

The discussions were generally enriching as several quotations were identified from the Bible and the Quran of continued advocacy on the need for the protection of the human right of women.

 

Later this year, a stage 2 of the meeting will be organized with selected members of both the Christian and Muslim groups examining issues of women’s human rights in the Muslim and Christian religious system, respectively.

 

 

 

Ife leadership training for professional women

21-25 March 2005.

 

Introduction

The leadership training workshop for professional women held in at the Conference centre of the Obafemi Awolowo Unviversity Ile-Ife. It was a four day training with 21 participants in attendance. Participants were drawn from different works of life like medical doctors, nurses, accountants, engineers, bankers, lecturers etc. Bunmi, Kehinde, Bukola and Oby facilitated the training.

 

The Workshop

Bunmi and Kehinde welcomed the participant to the workshop. Brief introductions of BAOBAB and Linkages were done by Oby and Kehinde respectively.

Participants and facilitators introduced themselves by saying their names, what they do, something about them that people do not know about, a nice thing that happened to you last week and an adjective that starts with the first letter of your name.

Participants’ expectations were: to know more about their rights as women, Learn tips on leadership, Skills enhancement, Make new friends, Share experiences, Learning new facilitation techniques and experiences

Challenges were Timing, Official work, Extension of work hours, Disappointing patients, anything new, resources, Family responsibilities.

One of the participants facilitated the Ground rules which were bidding on all participants.

 

What is gender?

Participants brainstormed on what gender is and the difference between gender and sex Gender is masculinity, feminity, neutrality, what men do to women, it is culturally based, not universal not enduring and it changes. While sex is biological difference, making love, universal, no difference in sex organs, sex is enduring

Stereotyping is some form or pattern that is imposed on us and we accept as normal e.g. cooking greetings, men are strong, women are emotional, and men should visit the mechanic

Girls are expected to be in the kitchen while boys watch television; dolls are for girls while toy guns and patrol cars are for boys.

Importance of understanding gender role

Believing in the role, atmosphere, individual understanding, consciousness of stereotyping, let there be exchange of roles, both gender should play multiple roles, prevention of exposing ones self.

The participants shared there personal experiences of gender roles of what men and women should do. Bunmi suggested that they look at what is healthy for them and not just what society wants.

 

A participant explained that our culture treats the women as a slave a second class citizen and inferior to the man. Another participant said that although some aspects of our culture are good   but other aspects that derogate women should be stopped. Another participant said that women should stop saying and believing that women are their worst enemies.  Bunmi added that it is important for spouses to see each other as partners and women should be able to contribute to the finances of the home while the men also do part of the housekeeping. She made participants understand that they should not generalize e.g. (women are their worst enemies but to know that it has to do with the individual.

 

It was agreed that a leader is accepting , hardworking, self-sufficient, caring, supportive, encouraging, listening, delegating, sharing, takes control, firm, patient, intelligent, knowledgeable, team worker, Inspiring, informs, confident, communicative, ,analytical, perceptive, creative, convincing, empowering, Objective, accepting, sensitive, Orderly, mindful, lovely, motivating, sensible, adventurous, accountable, diligent, decisive, friendly, tactful, resourceful, open, kind, assertive, sacrificial, helpful, active, visionary, proactive, forgiving, impartial, disciplined,  strategic, alert, persistent, painstaking, efficient, determined, terrific, optimistic, smart, initiating, observant, appreciative, flexible, trusting, thoughtful, humorous, respectful, outgoing, discerning, considerate, Brave, confidential, selfless, transparent and courageous.

 

During the session on What is my vision the participant said that the Bangladesh women believed in gender stereotyping and held on to it that was why they said that the money should be given to their husbands. Another participant’s intervention was that some women were independent and they would jump at the opportunity of establishing something for themselves. Bunmi added that we had empowerment before colonialism unlike popular belief that women empowerment came with colonialism.

There was more discussion on stereotyping of women. Participants pointed out that that when you are a married the Mrs. is always added to one’s name to show that she is married unlike the man for instance if a man is a doctor he would be addressed as Dr. X but if a woman is in a doctor she would be addressed as Dr. (Mrs). which is not necessary.

 

Our vision shouldn’t change but can be enlarged. Participants shared their visions where the concurrent words were noted and a group vision was formed. The vision statement is A healthy informed self-sufficient society with equal opportunities for all regardless of diversity in any form.

 

On communication, the participants shared personal experiences on who they thought is an effective communicator and gave reasons why they thought so.

The similarities drawn from their reasons are as follows; Effective communicators are objective, observant, analytical, bold, work with facts and are persuasive. After reading Marian Wright Edelman’s speech participants agreed that she is an effective communication because she used facts, is objective, innovating and compelling and with the use of statistics it gives a clearer picture of the situation.

 

By doing role plays, participants understood that in passing a message across one has to be diplomatic, careful with choice of words, patient, considerate and impartial.

 

Bunmi pointed out during the session on how do we serve diverse interests that no matter how diverse we are, if we have a common goal and vision we should work together too achieve it. Our diversity should not prevent us from doing so. Participants shared experiences on diverse interest for e.g. cultural and religious differences. Diversity is permanent and we do not have control over it for instance race, gender, religion, opinion, etc. A leader should accept people’s diversity and not tolerate it.

 

There were discussions on the two types of leadership the horizontal and vertical leadership. Advantages of horizontal leadership are commitment, creativity, sustainability, faster achievement of goals, happy people, and everybody’s vision is accommodated into the larger vision, better and healthier work environment and team work. It encourages sharing of responsibilities and gives everyone a sense of belonging. The possible disadvantage is that it takes time.

Advantages of Vertical leadership are that it is seemingly faster but the disadvantages are the opposite of horizontal leadership.

A participant shared an experience of a vertical mode of leadership in her work place where she got a query because she uses participatory learning in her class. She was advised to combine both her own methods and the departments own so as to reach a compromise and everybody is happy. A participant wanted to know if this kind of workshop was run for men. Bunmi responded by saying that women are the priority since men get opportunities more often, besides the men would try to dominate the workshop.

It is agreed on the importance of not talking down on people rather speaking to them like human beings; that way you would achieve more results.

 

How will we empower each other?

Empowerment means equipping, bringing out the best in each other, acquiring skills, equipping to help you utilize your potentials, the power of an individual and bringing out hidden abilities.

Pairing with each other and telling each other what they particularly liked about them and what they could improve on enlightened the participants on the effectiveness of such practice. They liked the exercise, the positive feedbacks made they feel good, it encouraged to be better. It is helpful for a leader to acknowledge the positive aspect of someone before advising on what to improve on. Such mode of communication is useful in bringing out the best in people.

 

Unity is important in mobilizing for action. It is necessary to carry people along in whatever one is doing. Once you have a goal or vision that everybody aggress with it is easy to mobilize for action.

 

Issues discussed

Participants agreed that women were well equipped to take up leadership roles because they do that at home. A popular saying goes “a man has his will, a woman has her way”. Women are caring; they play multiple roles in taking care of the home. It is important to see our husbands as partners and could ask them to help with the chores. How the person responds depends on the mode of communication. It is important to discuss issues and differences to be able to reach a consensus. The role of married women identified as wifely duties generated another steaming discussion. The participants wanted to clarify the issue of wifely duties. Sex came up as wifely duties. Some participants said that as married women they were obligated to sleep with their husbands. Even though it is supposed to be lovemaking, it has turned to sex because sometimes women when they are tired or do not feel like it. Women do all the housework, take care of the kids until very late at night which leaves them very tired when going to bed yet they are still expected to respond to their husband’s sexual advances in that tired state. Men however, come back from work eat and relax till they are ready to sleep. Women should initiate love making and should not leave it only for the men to do since both parties are to derive pleasure from it. Sexuality should be discussed by couples as to have a better sexual relationship as partners. A participant shared the story of a friend who is unhappy in her marriage where she does all the house chores and the husband does not help. Worst still he sleeps with her only when he wants to make babies.

Women should not do the house chores alone. They could ask their husbands to help out with the effective mode of communication. If all the qualities of a leader are applied in our everyday life things will change around us even in our homes.

 

Women’s political participation in Nigeria

Participants gave their opinion on women’s participation in Nigeria politics. They agreed that women were not adequately represented in decision making e.g. the national confab presently going on.  A participant was of the opinion that grass root women needed to be educated. Bunmi intervention was that what women need are sensitization and empowerment and not education because it is wrong to assume that women can not deliberate on issues affecting them due to lack of education. It is important for women to talk about issues that affect them because nobody will do it for them. Women can make a difference in our own little ways. Women are discouraged from participating in politics as it is believe to be a dirty game. It is necessary for women to support each other, appreciate each other, emphasize more on the positive sides and strengths and vote for women. Participants said that women have proven to be more accountable than men. It is important for leaders to be tactful, sensible, open and listen to others.

Participants pointed out that the media portray the women badly in the papers. They generalize a lot where it concerns women.

 

The next session on how do we define a successful organization highlighted on sexual harassment in the work place. Participants shared experiences on sexual harassment in higher institution as well as in the home. It is important that women talk when they are sexually harassed and not keep quiet. As leaders it is imperative to make impact in our environment.

 

 

Report of Human Rights Defenders consultative Workshop Convened by BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights on behalf of International Service for Human Rights.

March 21 -22, 2005

 

The workshop had 21 participants drawn from the NGO sector and represented women’s and other human rights organizations.

 

The Executive Director of BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights hereinafter referred to as BAOBAB welcomed participants to the workshop and said she hopes it had given participants an opportunity to network. Musa Gassama a representative of International Service of Human Rights hereinafter referred to ISHR introduced participants to the activities of ISHR which includes providing training for NGOs, information on what happens at the UN, every year they produce report on outcome of meetings at the UN and come up with documents which are given to NGOs during workshops. They also work to promote the rights of human rights defenders, for which they are partnering with BAOBAB. At the African level, they promote the adoption of resolutions for defenders of human rights, and the creation of the special rapporteur on human rights defenders. They facilitate the participation of NGOs; they therefore want to see what they can do with NGOs; on the way forward.

 

The participants were asked to introduce their organization and the rights they defend. The organizations represented were BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights, CIRRDOC, Community Life Project, Center for Rights in Development, League of Democratic Lawyers, National Human Rights Commission, WRAPA, Women in Focus, Agape Birth Rights, Development Initiatives, Alliances for Africa, work for the protection of the human rights of women.

 

The following were the objectives of the workshop:

 

-                      To Raise awareness among defenders on the planned visit of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Development

-                      To facilitate discussions on preparation and effective participation of defenders

(a)    identifying issues and priorities for the civil society

(b)    develop a strategy of communication with the DR on HRD

(c)    Developing coordination among defenders

(d)    Develop a follow-up strategy

(e)    Developing plans and action on publicity of the visit (media coverage)

 

There were sessions were on different topics, they are definition of human rights defenders, Minimum Standards that must be taken into cognizance by human rights defenders, The concept of Protection which includes Neutralizing the Messenger and Eliminating the Messenger. Protection Strategies i.e. National, Local and International

Regional: The African Regional on Peoples and Human Rights, European Union

UN declarations

Use of Networks

 

One of the facilitators (Julie) spoke about what is obtainable in the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders they are that the rights should be:

Legitimate and should conform to International standards

 

A case in Chile was cited where a human rights activist documented all cases of human rights abuses though he never won any of the cases but the documentation has come in handy in the prosecution of the abuser.

 

A participant said she had experienced all the abuses spoken about and therefore seeks to know how she can work to protect herself. Her organization works for the protection of women in the Niger Delta. She spoke about restrictions from going to monitor oil spillage in the Niger Delta. Julie a facilitator responded by saying that she should collaborate with other organizations to improve her situation.

 

There was a discussion on problems faced by human rights defenders in Nigeria:

Musa a facilitator stated that the people to target in defending human rights defenders is the government, and there own duty is to see that the UN representative makes a presentation to the government.  A participant discussed the reluctance of the countries to speak against US policies and that this is a problem. Sindi also spoke about the politics of exclusion, which makes it difficult to make an input. The international community also has a duty to research on who is sent to the UN. Another participant stated that Nigeria does not have coalitions as seen in the representation at the meetings, as against countries such as South Africa. Another participant stated that this would be an opportunity to work together to ensure that work goes on, and inability to receive funds from corporate organizations due to tax. Julie a facilitator cited the example of Irish government who pays for the NGO representatives to present their report at the UN. A participant stated that we should work more on coalitions; another participant stated that the problem we face is the lack of access to information, especially on laws and policies. Another participant stressed need for information. Another participant spoke about registration difficulties, research for names, etc., Other issues are difficulty of human rights defenders to go on with cases, issues of beaurocracy in a democratic governance, difficulty in accepting women in politics, use of police to stop peaceful demonstration. Musa a facilitator asked if people voted from the civil society have lived up to expectation, participants responded that the people from the civil society are still insignificant. A participant stated that Nigerians are giving democracy a chance so as not to go back to military rule, another problem is the fact that the government is the perpetrator, which has led to break down of law and order, pointing of guns at head, your opinion is sought on certain issues, and they give you assurance that you are not to be exposed, but the reverse is the case, use of civil society by the government, especially during riots, threats by government officials, phone calls, etc.  

 

Duties of The Special rapporteur: while in Nigeria she will receive reports on human rights violations, so as to carry out an analysis of the trends, what specific trends there are, information on individual cases. On the individual cases there are two types; one is urgent appeal, i.e. threats against the human rights defenders. The second case is that of allegation letters, this is a case of when allegations have already taken place, and ask government to responds. Although it might not produce an immediate result but at least the government is aware that the international community is aware. The procedure is normally confidential. 

 

Based on the information received by the special rapporteur, she is able to analyze the trends in violations. She participates in conferences, consultations, campaigns, and this helps her to understand all that defenders go through and the trends. An example of the issues of sexual harassment as reported in Brazil, within the civil society. Other function of the rapporteur is gaining information for instance visit prisons, and other groups. She showed some cases of the abuses women face in different parts of the world.  She urged participants to begin to think about a review methodology or what next. She further stated that the essence of the meeting was for us to work to ensure that civil society become part of the agenda setting.

 

The group work was to identify the violations or thematic issues defenders face in defending the rights of human rights.

 

Group One dealt with the Unfriendly environment Nigerian Human Rights Defenders operate in which include difficulty in registration of organization with the corporate affairs office and cost of doing so, Laws affecting assembly: Public order act: This act makes it difficult for individuals to hold peaceful protests. Official secret act: This act makes it difficult to get data or results of research from government parastatals.

Access and means of Expression: Cost of advert and televisions, impunity of security agents.  Non-condusive formation of NGO by government called GONGO, (Government NGO) and also situation when government disobeys laws, there are also no local funders for NGO work. Denial of visa to foreign partners, non-domestication of international treaties and documents that the government is signatory to.

Others include absence of human rights education, ineffective and corrupt judiciary and the legislature.

Social perception of Human Rights Defenders:

Cultural inhibitions against women Human Rights Defenders include hostility and name calling, men are called lazy and supporters of women.

Economic situation of Human Rights Defenders:

No pension scheme, continuity of tenure and strict funding rules.

Actors that affect Human Rights Defenders

Government and its agents, The police and other security agents like SSS, Cultural practices and religious fundamentalisms, Judiciary and Politicians

Group 2:

Types of risk and risks faced by defenders

Threat to life, Culture limiting women’s participation, Limited access to information,

Violation of laws with impunity starting from the federal government. This makes our job difficult, Lack of acceptance of women’s rights as human rights even within the human rights community, overt government sponsored opposition, Language

 

Difficulty in registration of human rights NGOs, Character assassination and impuning our reputation and Lack of financial sustainability

 

Risks
Arrests/extra judicial killings, Disappearance, Internal displacement, Loss of livelihood

Internal and external restriction of movement, High level of insecurity and Frivolous prosecution

Impact on the human right defenders

Lack of commitment of young activists and quality of defenders is diminishing

 

Julie, a participant started the day with the background information and how to prepare to meet with the special rapporteur. She informed participants that her travel and document will be prepared by her assistance and while she is here she will be working mostly with the UNDP office here in Nigeria. If NGOs send her a background document then this would help her prepare the issues that she will be presented with in Nigeria. She therefore stated that the following issues should be communicated to her:

 

Difficulties we earlier enumerated on freedom of expression, assembly and access to information, issues on public order acts and official statute acts and how they affect NGOs. We should make the presentation precise, and clear to assist her. Other areas include issues of registration of NGOs, and a brief discussion on how this affects us, the cost implication of registration and how this stops us from carrying out our work. Other issues are thematic issues as it affects human rights work in Nigeria. We should also decide the contents of the agenda and places she might visit.

 

Participants stated the need to agree on the point person for the project so that reports will be collated and sent to ISHR to forward on NGO behalf. BAOBAB was identified as the secretariat. It was stated that the difficulty of registering organizations such as representatives of lesbian and homosexuals could be cited as difficulty presently faced.  They were urged to involve other NGOs that are not represented to ensure a more representation of NGOs.

 

She also stated that while the rapporteur is in Nigeria, she will hold meetings with representatives of the UN, and then a press conference on the last day, to give a feedback of what her assessment has been. She will be meeting with the head of state and ministers, enforcement agencies, minister for defense, authorities of the judiciary, parliamentary representatives, human rights institutions in Nigeria, regional and local court judges, trade unions, journalists, gay and lesbian groups, to ensure that their voices are heard, E.U. representatives, etc.

 

She urged NGOs to try to formulate recommendations to assist her in preparing her report. The follow up depends on participants and stated that the International Service for Human Rights will be willing to sponsor any collaboration as they come from participants. Participants spoke about forming committees, and this was rejected. Another participant form Niger Delta volunteered to chair the group. It was finally agreed that groups should go back to their state, meet with other human rights activist, and come up with documents on human rights defenders challenges, this should be sent to BAOBAB offices for final presentation to the organizers. The executive Director of BAOBAB said the deadline of April 2, 2005 when the document is required in Geneva must be adhered to.

 

The facilitators noted that since the inception of democracy in Nigeria reports normally sent to the African Commission on violations of Human rights issues in Nigeria are on the decline. A participant stated that the decline in reports is caused by lack of funds to invite the chair to visit countries, and the fact that individuals are not aware of the existence of this office. It was stated that the African Union has been advised to channel more funds towards issues of human rights. 

 

Julie gave a few tips on the European Union Guidelines for protecting human rights defenders. She therefore stated that they would like to hear how we engage EU in protecting the rights of human rights defenders in Nigeria. It was suggested that the NGOs represented should write a joint proposal to the European Union for work in the area of defending human rights defenders.

 

Africa Regional Roaming Institute for Women’s Leadership and Training of Trainers

Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria

February 21- 25 2005

 

The Institute consisted of twenty-five participants in all from eight African countries. Hafsat Abiola (Nigeria), member, W.L.P. Board of Directors, standing in for Mahnaz Afhami, the Executive Director of WLP declared the workshop open. In the note read on behalf of Mahnaz, Hafsat recounted other countries where the Institute was replicated. These are Afghanistan, Morocco and Jordan. One is being planned to hold in Asia. She added that the institute envisages the development of a kind of leadership that is horizontal and not based on hierarchy; based on consensus and dialogue rather than command with the aim of creating shared vision based on mutual understanding and respect.

It seeks to create a gender-sensitive society in the area of women’s human rights and other issues as they affect women despite their diversities. It also seeks to encourage women to realize and utilize the leadership qualities in them.

The goal of the institute was to enhance the capacity of participants to become better trainers and advocates and ensure full participation of women at all level in society using a methodology of skill building, information and experience sharing.

 

At the beginning of the Institute everyone was hopeful that all the objectives would be met with minimal obstacles which could be posed by time constraints and language barrier on the path of a couple of participants that speak very little English.

 

The objective of the first session, Power, Gender and Leadership was to discuss power and analyze the connection between power and gender. There was a brainstorm on what the terms are and is and what they are not.

 

Leadership is  Gender inclusive, Participatory, Innovative, Listening, Responsible, Order/ empowering     

 

Leadership is not dictatorial, indecisive, cohesive, Abusive / Authoritative

Negative use: leads to abuse of power and Deaf

 

The methodology used throughout the workshop was participatory. Roles were sometimes swapped. Participants were called upon to, facilitate, write on the flip chart board or call on other participants to make contributions.

 

Dramatization and role-play were used extensively as the participants broke into groups to take on roles, which they later presented to the larger group amidst rib cracking laughter. The session on transforming leadership couldn’t have been done better.   The objectives of the session were to criticize hierarchical leadership strategies and consider the principles on which a learning society could transform hierarchical leadership into horizontal and participatory leadership. Group one’s presentation was based on discrimination against women in the workplace, while group two presented on communicating with members of the society. Group three presented a scenario on the unequal representation of women in politics.

 

Participants shared personal stories in the session titled ‘Leadership challenges, crisis and achievements’.  The session afforded the participant the opportunity to share their personal experiences in the course of leadership.

 

After the narrations the stories were analyzed and the strategies employed were listed. The common themes in them were as follows:

Being sacrificial lambs; the quality moving to action; the quality of producing results; The quality of not talking or taking rash action when provoked; Having the clear vision of what the organisation is about and sticking to it; Information sharing and dissemination; Being cautious; Lobbying; High self esteem

 

Common themes were Change threatens people, Pull her down syndrome, Distrust amongst elitist women

 

Missing themes were Inclusiveness (sensitivity) appropriate use of language

 

Elements of power were; Leadership intimidates, Looking for points of dissention, Formation of cliques.

 

The objectives of the session on communicating effectively were:

To analyse the characteristics of an effective communicator; To demonstrate the importance of communication for effective leadership; To consider how to be persuasive when motivating educating and negotiating with others and to analyse people’s personal stories of communication.

 

The passage titled “I care and I am willing to serve” culled from the leadership Training Manual “Leading to Choices” was used as a case study. The story was discussed and analyzed. This was followed by group activity in which participants were asked to communicate unpleasant situations to each other in a way that their audience or listeners would not find offensive.

 

The facilitators were creative when it came to sharing the participants into groups. For example, instead of the usual picking of numbers, which was becoming too monotonous, names of heroines’ fruits, animals, etc were used to group the participants. This made the whole exercise more interesting and lively. For this particular group exercise the participants went into groups of mango, paw paw and watermelon. One group was to address a case in which a colleague who had body odor was to be communicated to on her condition and what to do. The other two groups were to communicate to a group of women who have refused to have their children immunized against polio and influence a minister to get the government to abrogate a decree passed by the government, which did not favour women respectively.

After the presentation the participants critiqued the performance. In the final analysis it was agreed that effective communication involves good listening skills, good oratory skills and should be engaging.

 

Each day of the meeting began with a recap and ended with wrap up. These help to refresh the participants’ memories and put them in the right mood for the day’s activities. Still on communication, the participants deliberated on what it takes for communication to be persuasive. There was a brainstorm on this, which had this output:

 

Persuasive                                                                           Not persuasive

Use of facts                                                                         Giving ultimatum/threats

Personalising information                                                   I know it all attitude

Dialoguing                                                                         Aggressive (verbal & non verbal

Seizing strategic opportunities to convey message            Box people to a corner

Respecting and valuing other peoples’ opinions                Using questionable facts.

Giving the person the choice to decide

Awakening the person’s self interest

Always remain in focus

 

In the course of carrying out their tasks as leaders and advocates partici